"Stay loyal and you'll be rewarded" is career advice from 1985. The data says the opposite: Federal Reserve tracking shows job switchers earn 5.5% annual wage growth vs. 4.1% for stayers. Compounded over a decade, that gap reaches six figures. The sweet spot: 2-3 years early career, 3-4 years mid-career, 4-5 years in senior roles. This isn't "job hopping" — it's the single most effective salary strategy that exists.
This article was researched and written by the Careery team — that helps land higher-paying jobs faster than ever! Learn more about Careery →
Quick Answers
How often should you change jobs?
Every 2-3 years in early career (first 10 years), 3-4 years mid-career, and 4-5 years in senior roles. This cadence maximizes salary growth while building enough tenure at each stop to show real impact. Staying 5+ years without a promotion is a bigger resume risk than leaving at 2.
Is job hopping bad?
Strategic job changes aren't 'hopping' — they're optimization. What IS bad: three consecutive stints under 12 months with no upward trajectory and no clear narrative. One short stay is a story. Three is a warning sign.
How much more do you earn by switching?
10-20% per strategic switch vs. 3-5% annual raises for staying. Two well-timed switches in a decade adds $100,000+ in cumulative earnings. The math isn't subtle.
What's the minimum time to stay at a job?
18-24 months. Long enough to complete one full project cycle, show measurable impact, and not trigger 'flight risk' concerns at your next interview.
Your parents' career advice was built for a different economy. They stayed at one company for 15 years, got annual raises, earned a pension, and retired with a gold watch. That world is dead.
In the current labor market, the professionals who earn the most aren't the most loyal — they're the most strategic. And the data behind that claim isn't a blog post opinion. It's tracked monthly by the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta publishes a Wage Growth Tracker that compares earnings growth for job switchers vs. job stayers. The results are consistent year after year:
1.4% doesn't sound like much. Let's compound it.
Starting salary: $100K. One person stays, one switches every 3 years for a 15% bump.
Year 10 salary gap: $75,735. That's not a one-time difference — it's a permanent lift that resets your earnings trajectory for the next 20+ years.
And that's the conservative model. Switchers also tend to get better titles, broader scope, and equity packages that stayers never see — because new companies price you at market rate, while your current employer prices you at what they already got you for.
Loyalty isn't free. It costs approximately $1,400 per year per $100K of salary. Over a decade, that's the price of a new car. Over a career, it's the price of a house. The labor market rewards movement — not because employers are evil, but because the system is structurally designed to underpay incumbents and overpay new hires.
These are frameworks, not rules. A startup that goes from 10 to 500 people might justify 5 years of early-career tenure because the growth is exponential. A stagnant corporate role might warrant leaving at 18 months. Read the situation — but default to movement, not comfort.
Strategic movement is smart. Random movement is destructive. Three scenarios where switching backfires:
1. A pattern of short stints with no upward trajectory
One 10-month stay is a story ("company restructured," "role was misrepresented"). Three consecutive sub-12-month stays is a pattern that tells hiring managers: this person can't commit, can't perform, or can't work with others.
The rule: If you have one short tenure, the next role needs to be 2+ years. The pattern matters more than any individual stay.
2. Lateral moves disguised as career changes
Switching for the same title, same scope, and a 5% bump isn't strategic — it's restless. Each move on your resume needs to answer the question: "What did this add to your career arc?" If the answer is "basically the same job for slightly more money" — it looks like you can't grow within a role.
Before switching, ask: What does this move add to my story that my current role can't? If you can't articulate it clearly, you're not ready to switch.
3. Leaving right before a financial milestone
Walking away from $25K in unvested RSUs, a $15K annual bonus that pays in 60 days, or a sabbatical eligibility at Year 3 is expensive impulsivity. Run the numbers before timing your exit.
Use our pre-quit checklist to make sure you're not leaving money on the table in the name of "following your passion."
Four scenarios where staying is the worse option:
1. Comp has flatlined
No meaningful raise in 18+ months and negotiation has stalled. The external market will pay you 10-20% more for the same work. That's not disloyalty — that's arithmetic.
2. Growth is blocked
You've been passed over for promotion, or there's simply no opening above you. The fastest path to the next level is often a lateral exit to a higher role at a new company. The person who gets promoted externally is the same person who was "not ready" internally.
3. Skills are stagnating
Your company runs on 2019 tools. The industry uses 2026 tools. Every month the gap widens, and every month the transition to a modern stack gets harder. Skill obsolescence is a slow crisis that doesn't feel urgent until it's too late to fix painlessly.
4. A compelling offer lands
A real offer — 15%+ increase, title bump, or materially better growth opportunity. This is the counter offer scenario: negotiate to stay or accept the upgrade. Either way, you win — because you're making the decision from a position of strength, not from desperation.
Different industries have different tolerance for movement:
Know your industry's norms. In tech, a 2-year stint is Tuesday. In government, it's an eyebrow raise. Calibrate accordingly.
Here's what a strategically optimized decade looks like:
Years 0-2: Learn aggressively
Take a role that maximizes learning, not salary. Build foundational skills, absorb everything, and leave when the learning curve flattens — usually 18-24 months. Your first role is an investment, not a destination.
Years 2-4: First strategic switch
Target 15-20% salary increase and a title or scope upgrade. This is your proof of concept — you can get hired at a higher level than where you started. Stay 2-3 years to demonstrate impact.
Years 4-7: Establish your lane
By now you're mid-career. The next move should position you as a specialist or emerging leader. Aim for senior IC or management. Stay 3+ years to build a credible track record of leading outcomes, not just contributing to them.
Years 7-10: The leap (optional)
Your salary should be 50-100% above where you started. If the current company is still growing you — stay. If growth has plateaued, make one more strategic move for a significant scope or comp jump. This is the role that sets your trajectory for the following decade.
Professionals who build professional visibility alongside this map have a structural edge: they don't have to cold-apply for roles 3 and 4. Opportunities find them through recruiter inbound and referral networks. Each switch becomes more targeted, more lucrative, and less stressful.
Key Takeaways
- 1Job switchers earn 5.5% annual growth vs. 4.1% for stayers — compounding to six figures over a decade
- 2Sweet spot: 2-3 years early career, 3-4 mid-career, 4-5 senior
- 3Switching hurts when it creates a pattern of short stints with no progression narrative
- 4Switching accelerates when comp is flat, growth is blocked, skills are stagnating, or a real offer lands
- 5Industry context matters — tech normalizes 2-year stints, government expects 5-10+
- 6Professional visibility turns every career move from a gamble into a strategic upgrade
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 2 years long enough at a job?
In most industries, yes. Two years is one full project cycle — enough to demonstrate impact and leave with a credible story. In tech and startups, 2 years is standard. In more traditional fields, aim for 2.5-3 as a minimum.
Does job hopping look bad on a resume?
A pattern of 3+ short stints (under 18 months) without upward trajectory looks bad. But 2-3 year tenures with clear progression — higher titles, broader scope, better companies — reads as ambition, not instability. The narrative you tell in interviews matters as much as the timeline.
What do recruiters think about job hopping?
Recruiters care about two things: pattern and story. A clear upward trajectory with 2-3 year stints is ideal. Frequent lateral moves or unexplained short stays are flags. Have a 1-sentence explanation for each move ready.
Should I stay just because I like my coworkers?
Coworkers are a real quality-of-life factor. But they shouldn't be the primary reason to stay if your growth and compensation have stalled. Good people exist at many companies — and your best coworkers want you to succeed, even if that means leaving.
At what career stage should you stop switching?
It's not about age — it's about diminishing returns. In executive roles, longer tenures (5+ years) demonstrate the ability to build and sustain. But even at the C-level, strategic moves happen. The key: each move should be a clear, significant upgrade in scope, comp, or impact.
Researching Job Market & Building AI Tools for careerists since December 2020
Sources & References
- Wage Growth Tracker — Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (2025)
- Employee Tenure Summary — U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024)