How to Make $1 Million a Year: What It Actually Takes to Earn 7 Figures

Brought to you by Careery

This article was researched and written by the Careery team — that helps land higher-paying jobs faster than ever! Learn more about Careery →

One million dollars a year. Not in a lifetime — in a single year. It's the number people daydream about and assume is reserved for celebrities, athletes, and tech founders who got lucky.

It's not. Roughly 160,000 Americans file tax returns showing $1M+ in adjusted gross income every year. They're not all famous. Most are invisible — running businesses, closing deals, leading companies, and making partner at firms you've never heard of.

But here's what separates $1M from every other income milestone: at this level, the rules change. The Income Leap Strategy — promote or switch, amplified by personal brand — still explains how you build the foundation. But at seven figures, you've transcended the framework. You're no longer trading time for a higher salary. You're participating in ownership economics.

The top 0.1% sounds impossibly exclusive. It is exclusive — but it's also more accessible than "one in a thousand" suggests.

Consider the math differently: 160,000 people in the U.S. earn $1M+ per year. That's more than the population of Syracuse, New York. It's roughly three full NFL stadiums. These are not statistical anomalies — they're a population, with patterns that repeat.

IRS Statistics of Income data reveals what most of these earners have in common: the majority of their income is not wages. For taxpayers earning $1M+, only about 33% of total income comes from salaries and wages. The rest comes from business income, capital gains, partnership and S-corp distributions, and investment returns.

That's the fundamental insight. At $200K, the game is still about being a highly valued employee. At $500K, it's about being an elite employee with equity upside. At $1M, the employee model is largely left behind. You're an owner, a partner, or someone whose compensation is tied directly to the value you create — not the hours you work.

That distinction matters because it changes the strategy entirely. If you're optimizing for salary, you hit a ceiling. If you're building ownership, the ceiling disappears.

A million-dollar base salary is one of the rarest compensation structures in the American economy. Even Fortune 500 CEOs — the most visible high earners in the country — typically take base salaries of $1-1.5M, with the remaining $10-30M coming from equity grants, performance bonuses, and stock options (SEC proxy filings, 2024).

The math explains why pure salary can't scale to $1M for most roles. Employers pay salaries from operating budgets. A $1M salary means the employee must generate multiples of that in direct, attributable revenue or value — and most roles can't demonstrate that link clearly enough for a compensation committee to approve it.

The rare exceptions where pure salary reaches $1M:

• Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons: Median compensation for neurosurgeons exceeds $800K, with top earners surpassing $1M (Medscape Physician Compensation Report, 2024). This is the only widespread path to $1M through pure professional services billing.
• Hedge fund portfolio managers: Base salaries at top-tier quantitative funds (Citadel, Renaissance, Two Sigma) can exceed $1M — but the real compensation comes from performance fees.
• Elite law firm equity partners: Top partners at firms like Wachtell, Lipton or Kirkland & Ellis earn $5-10M+ — but most of that is profit distribution, not salary.
• Fortune 500 C-suite officers: SEC filings show median total compensation for S&P 500 CEOs at $16.7M (AFL-CIO Executive Paywatch, 2024) — but base salary is typically only $1-1.5M of that total.

The salary model has a ceiling. The ownership model doesn't. Here are the five paths where ownership economics create seven-figure outcomes.

Every seven-figure earner falls into one of five categories. Each has different risk profiles, timelines, and trade-offs — but they all share one trait: compensation is tied to value created, not hours worked.

Path 1: C-suite executive (base + equity + bonus)

The classic corporate path. CEO, CFO, CTO, or COO at a mid-cap to large-cap company. Total compensation typically breaks down as 15-20% base salary, 20-30% annual bonus, and 50-60% long-term equity incentives.

Typical numbers: $300-500K base + $200-400K bonus + $300K-1M+ in equity grants = $800K-2M+ total comp at companies with $500M+ revenue.

Timeline: 15-25 years. The typical C-suite executive started as an individual contributor, moved through director and VP ranks, and often made 2-3 strategic company switches along the way.

The key: This path rewards career advancement strategy executed over decades. Visibility to the board is everything — the executive team is chosen by people who already know the candidates' reputations.

Path 2: Tech equity (pre-IPO, hedge fund, RSU windfall)

The path that creates the most dramatic wealth stories. A VP of Engineering at a Series C startup earning $350K in base + $650K in equity that vests into a post-IPO stock price of 5-10x the grant price.

Typical numbers: $250-400K base + $500K-2M+ in equity upside = $750K-2M+ in realized comp during liquidity events.

Timeline: 5-12 years. Faster than C-suite, but with significantly more risk. Most startups fail. The equity is worth $0 until a liquidity event. But when it hits, the returns are asymmetric.

The key: Picking the right company at the right stage. Series B-D companies with strong revenue growth, proven product-market fit, and a credible path to IPO or acquisition. Negotiating the offer — specifically the equity component — is where fortunes are made or lost.

Path 3: Professional services partner (law, consulting, PE/VC)

Partnership at an elite firm converts years of grinding associate work into an ownership stake in a profit-generating machine.

Typical numbers: Equity partners at Am Law 100 firms average $1.2M in profit distributions (American Lawyer, 2024). Managing directors at McKinsey, Bain, and BCG earn $800K-1.5M. Partners at PE and VC firms earn $500K-1M base + carried interest that can add millions.

Timeline: 8-15 years. Associate for 6-8 years, senior associate or principal for 2-3 years, then partner. The path is well-defined but brutally selective — partnership acceptance rates at top firms range from 5-15%.

The key: Specialization and client relationships. The associates who make partner are the ones who become the firm's known expert on a specific practice area — and who bring in clients.

Path 4: Enterprise sales leadership

The most overlooked path. Top enterprise account executives at major SaaS companies earn $500K-1M+ in on-target earnings. Sales VPs and CROs at scale-ups routinely cross $1M.

Typical numbers: $150-250K base + $350-750K variable commission + equity = $500K-1.5M+ OTE for senior sales leaders at companies with $50M+ ARR.

Timeline: 8-12 years. Start as a BDR/SDR, progress to account executive, move to enterprise accounts, then sales leadership. The top 5% of enterprise AEs at companies like Salesforce, Snowflake, or CrowdStrike earn $500K+ as individual contributors — before moving into leadership.

The key: Quota attainment at scale. The math is transparent: if your quota is $5M and your OTE is $500K at 100% attainment, then hitting 150% of quota = $750K. Top performers consistently over-achieve, and the base + accelerators push total comp well past $1M.

Path 5: Business ownership

The broadest and most varied path. A SaaS company with $3M ARR paying the founder $1M. An agency doing $5M in revenue with 30% margins. A medical or dental practice. A franchise portfolio.

Typical numbers: Entirely dependent on business economics. Rule of thumb: to reliably pay yourself $1M, you need a business generating $3-5M+ in revenue with strong margins — or a portfolio of smaller businesses.

Timeline: 4-15 years. The variance is enormous. A well-executed SaaS business can reach $3M ARR in 3-4 years. A consulting practice scaled to $5M might take 8-10 years. A franchise portfolio generating $1M in owner income often takes 10-15 years of reinvestment.

The key: Building something that generates revenue independent of your hourly input. That's the ownership economics principle at its purest — and it's why business ownership has created more millionaires than any other path.

Numbers and timelines are useful. But seeing how real people navigated these paths — the specific moves, the inflection points, the decisions that mattered — is what turns strategy into conviction.

Case 1: SaaS founder — $0 to $1.2M in year 4

Start: Senior product manager at a mid-size tech company, $165K total comp, 8 years experience. Deep expertise in one vertical (healthcare compliance).

Year 1: Quit to build a SaaS tool solving the exact compliance pain point clients kept describing. No funding — bootstrapped with $50K in savings. Revenue at end of year 1: $180K ARR.

Year 2: Hired two engineers and a marketer. ARR hit $720K. Took $120K in salary — less than the old job, but the equity was 100% owned.

Year 3: Product-market fit confirmed. ARR crossed $1.8M. Salary moved to $250K. Started getting acquisition interest.

Year 4: ARR reached $3.2M with 75% gross margins. Total founder compensation (salary + distributions): $1.2M. No investors to dilute. Full ownership.

The insight: Domain expertise from 8 years as a product manager was the foundation. The million didn't come from getting a higher salary — it came from building a product that generated recurring revenue. The personal brand built during those 8 years as a known expert in healthcare compliance became the company's initial customer acquisition channel.

Case 2: VP Engineering — $350K to $1.1M via pre-IPO equity

Start: Senior engineering manager at a public tech company, $350K total comp (base + RSUs at mature valuation).

Year 1: Recruited as VP of Engineering at a Series C startup. Base salary: $280K (a base pay cut). But the equity grant: 0.3% of the company at a $400M valuation = $1.2M in paper value, vesting over 4 years.

Year 3: Company reached $150M ARR and filed for IPO. Valuation at IPO: $2.8B. His 0.3% stake (partially vested): ~$4.2M in total value over the vesting period, or roughly $1.1M per year in realized compensation.

The insight: The base salary decreased. The total comp exploded because of equity selection. The critical decision was joining a company at the right stage — Series C with strong revenue, experienced leadership, and a credible IPO path. That decision was possible because this engineer had built a reputation (thought leadership) that made the startup's CEO recruit him directly.

Case 3: Law partner — $250K associate to $1.4M partner in 10 years

Start: Third-year associate at an Am Law 50 firm, $250K total comp. Specializing in mergers and acquisitions.

Year 5: Made senior associate. Salary: $370K. Started developing a niche in tech M&A — the intersection of legal expertise and industry knowledge.

Year 8: Made equity partner. First-year partner compensation: $850K (profit distributions + base). Not $1M yet — but the trajectory was clear.

Year 10: Built a book of business exceeding $5M. Total partner compensation: $1.4M. The profit distribution from the firm was directly tied to the revenue generated by client relationships.

The insight: Ten years of deep specialization. The $1M didn't come from billing more hours — it came from becoming the firm's known expert in tech M&A, which attracted clients who specifically requested that expertise. The thought leadership examples pattern applies: the partners who earn the most are the ones who are publicly known in their specialization.

Here's the pattern most people miss: very few $1M earners have a single income source that pays $1M. Instead, they stack.

A typical $1M income stack might look like: $350K base salary as a VP at a growth-stage company + $200K annual bonus + $300K in vesting equity + $100K from two advisory board seats + $50K in investment income. No single line reaches seven figures. The stack does.

This is why the Income Leap Strategy framework is transcended at $1M. The promote-or-switch model optimizes one income stream — your salary. At seven figures, the strategy shifts to building and stacking multiple income streams where each one is powered by ownership economics.

Nobody starts at $1M. The overnight success story at seven figures is almost always a 10-15 year overnight success.

The typical trajectory looks like this: $80-120K in the first 3-5 years (building competence). $150-300K in years 5-10 (building expertise and reputation). $300-500K in years 8-12 (leadership, equity, early ownership). $500K-1M+ in years 10-18 (full ownership economics kicking in).

The compounding effect explains why. Every career move — each promotion, each strategic switch, each skill addition — doesn't just add to income. It multiplies the base for the next move. A 20% switch from $150K lands at $180K. A 20% switch from $300K lands at $360K. The same percentage creates a much bigger dollar jump from a higher base.

This is why the foundation matters so much. The professionals who reach $1M by year 12 instead of year 20 are the ones who aggressively built their base in years 1-7. They didn't wait for 3% annual raises — they used the promote-and-switch strategy documented in our guides on reaching $200K and $500K to build a foundation strong enough for ownership economics to take over.

At six figures, personal brand is a booster — it makes promotions and switches faster. At seven figures, personal brand is not optional. It's the operating system.

Every $1M path described above depends on being a known quantity. The C-suite executive is recruited by board members who already know their reputation. The startup VP is headhunted by a CEO who's followed their work. The law partner wins clients because prospects already associate their name with expertise. The sales leader builds relationships that follow them across companies. The business owner acquires customers through the authority they've built.

At $1M, you are either known or you are invisible. There is no middle ground.

This is where thought leadership strategy becomes a direct income driver, not just a career enhancement. The partners, executives, and founders earning $1M+ are almost universally recognized names within their specific domains. They speak at conferences, publish in industry outlets, and maintain networks that generate opportunities without active job searching.

The playbook: start building your personal brand now — even if $1M is a decade away. Brand compounds like interest. The professionals who arrive at seven figures with an established reputation command significantly more than those who arrive with equal skills but no visibility.

Every article about seven-figure income makes it sound aspirational. This section makes it honest.

Making $1M a year is not a lifestyle upgrade from $500K. It's a fundamentally different relationship with work — and the trade-offs are real.

Time. Most $1M earners work 55-70+ hours per week. C-suite executives are on call to boards. Founders work weekends. Partners bill relentlessly. Enterprise sales leaders are on planes. The hours don't necessarily decrease as income rises — they often increase.

Health. A Harvard Business Review study found that senior executives report significantly higher rates of burnout, sleep disruption, and chronic stress than the general professional population. The income is higher. The cortisol is also higher.

Relationships. The same intensity that drives seven-figure income often strains marriages, friendships, and family time. This isn't inevitable — but it requires conscious, deliberate management that many high earners don't prioritize until the damage is done.

Golden handcuffs. Once you earn $1M, your lifestyle inflates. The house, the schools, the commitments. Walking away from a toxic $1M role is harder than walking away from a toxic $100K role — because the financial obligations are proportionally larger. The freedom that money was supposed to buy can become its own prison.

None of this means you shouldn't pursue seven figures. It means you should pursue it with open eyes. The professionals who sustain $1M+ income and maintain their health, relationships, and sanity are the ones who chose this path deliberately — not the ones who stumbled into it chasing a number.

Prepared by Careery Team

Editorial Policy →

Reviewed byBogdan Serebryakov

Researching Job Market & Building AI Tools for careerists · since December 2020