Is LinkedIn Premium Worth It in 2026? Honest Math (and a Better $775 Alternative)

You paid $30 for LinkedIn Premium. You sent 5 InMails. None of them got a response.

Meanwhile, the subscription auto-renewed three times before you noticed. That's $120 for zero conversations — and you're not alone. Over 80% of Reddit users who tried Premium say the same thing: it wasn't worth it.

But here's the number that changes the entire equation: sourced candidates — people found by recruiters, not people chasing recruiters — are 8x more likely to be hired.

So the real question isn't whether Premium is worth $30/month. The question is whether you should be chasing opportunities at all — or building the kind of visibility that makes opportunities chase you.

Brought to you by Careery

This article was researched and written by the Careery team — that helps land higher-paying jobs faster than ever! Learn more about Careery →

Eight times.

Let's look at the math honestly — then you decide.

The regrets:

The pattern in the complaints:

When Reddit says it worked:

The 15% who found value shared very specific traits:

Let's strip away the marketing and assess each feature honestly:

InMail credits (5/month) — the headline feature

InMail lets you message anyone on LinkedIn, even without a connection. You get 5 credits per month (roll over up to 90 days).

Who viewed your profile (full list, 90 days)

Free LinkedIn shows a teaser. Premium shows names, companies, and titles of everyone who viewed you for 90 days.

Applicant insights — the feel-good metric

Premium shows how you compare to other applicants and whether you're a "top applicant."

LinkedIn Learning — the hidden gem

Full access to 16,000+ courses. A standalone subscription costs $29.99/month separately.

Featured Applicant badge & Open Profile

"Featured applicant" on Easy Apply jobs. Open Profile lets anyone message you free.

Let's do the math that LinkedIn's marketing team doesn't want you to see.

LinkedIn Premium over a 6-month job search

The optimistic scenario

The realistic scenario

You send 30 InMails over 6 months. 3 respond. 1 leads to a phone screen that goes nowhere. You also use profile insights to reach out to a recruiter who viewed you — that actually leads to an interview (but you could have done this with a free connection request).

The most common scenario (per Reddit)

You subscribe. Send a few generic InMails that get ignored. Check profile views once. Never use LinkedIn Learning. The subscription auto-renews for 6 months because you forgot to cancel.

Now let's look at this from a completely different angle.

What if instead of chasing, you became the person recruiters find?

The math that matters

If one recruiter finds your published expert article six months from now and reaches out — the entire investment paid for itself. And unlike InMails, the visibility compounds: the article ranks higher over time, more people see it, more opportunities appear.

Who this makes sense for

The Personal Brand Package is the better starting investment if:

• You're early in your search and want to set up the infrastructure before grinding applications
• You want recruiters to find you rather than hoping your InMails get responses
• You value permanent assets over monthly subscriptions
• You want to be positioned as an expert in your field, not just another applicant
• You're planning to leverage your personal brand for career growth — raises, promotions, and new opportunities — not just this one job search

1. You're in a short, aggressive networking sprint (1-3 months)

You've identified 20-30 specific people at target companies. You need to reach decision-makers who don't accept connection requests. InMail is your channel. Subscribe, use it intensively, cancel.

2. You need to identify who's looking at your profile

If you've already optimized your LinkedIn (or had it done professionally), tracking who views your profile lets you reach out to warm leads. A recruiter who viewed you is a warm contact — don't let that signal go to waste.

3. You're actively upskilling and want LinkedIn Learning

If you need specific skills and want the courses to show on your profile, LinkedIn Learning bundled with Premium is decent value. But check YouTube and Coursera first — many equivalents are free.

4. You're used it strategically before and know it works for you

Some people — the 15% on Reddit — genuinely convert InMails into opportunities because they know how to write compelling outreach. If that's you, you already know. If you've never sent a cold InMail that got a response, this probably isn't the subscription that fixes that.

Before spending anything, exhaust these:

Instead of InMail: connection requests + public engagement

You can send connection requests with a 300-character note to anyone — for free. If they accept, message freely. Save InMail for the rare people who don't accept.

Instead of profile viewer insights: optimize your profile

Instead of LinkedIn Learning: free platforms

• YouTube — millions of free tutorials on everything
• Coursera / edX — free courses from top universities
• freeCodeCamp — the gold standard for free tech education
• Google Career Certificates — industry-recognized credentials

Instead of Featured Applicant badge: apply early

The badge has no proven impact. Applying within 48 hours of posting and following up directly with the hiring manager is far more effective. Most people don't follow up — that's your differentiator, and it's free.

Three different tools solve three different problems. Most people need at least two.

1. Start with visibility (Personal Brand Package) — build the foundation that makes you findable. This is the permanent asset.
2. Add automation if you need application volume — AI auto-apply tools handle the repetitive work.
3. Add Premium for 1-2 months if you need InMail access for a targeted networking sprint — then cancel.

In that order. Most people do it backwards: they buy Premium first, burn through 6 months getting under 10% InMail responses, and never invest in the thing that actually changes the game — being visible enough that people come to them.

Prepared by Careery Team

Editorial Policy →

Reviewed byBogdan Serebryakov

Researching Job Market & Building AI Tools for careerists · since December 2020